

A primitive architectural intention was used to establish building and landscape through the metaphor of a ruin. The site was conceived as a large garden to hold program for daily activities. Heavy masonry walls intersect the site, carving out public and private courtyard gardens, creating new entries into rooms through garden spaces. Encouraging the inhabitants to engage with the surrounding climate, landscape and structure.
The main garden walls wrap the internal rooms of the existing building, creating a structure that appears to have no glass nor function. This contributes to the ruin metaphor, forming a solid physical mass embodying the endurance of a ruin - reduced to what lasts.
By maintaining as much of the existing building fabric as possible and working with the existing plan, a strategy to the wrap the building with new structure and maintain the central spaces within the home was developed. This enabled the family to live on site during the construction of the new built works. Reducing the overall cost of the project.
By maintaining as much of the existing building fabric as possible and working with the existing plan, a strategy to the wrap the building with new structure and maintain the central spaces within the home was developed. This enabled the family to live on site during the construction of the new built works. Reducing the overall cost of the project.
Returning to first principles of building led to a questioning of how to create an opening in a wall - through forms or by pulling structure apart? As the construction of the dwelling was precast and tilt up concrete panel it was treat by separating two elements. This is evident in plan as well as elevation, in plan the roof is stretched to become a skylight over the doorway to the boot-room. In elevation the garden walls are pulled apart to form a new entry and doorway into the existing dwelling.
















